# Chapter 4Trig Derivatives through geometry

Let's try to reason through what the derivatives of the functions sine and cosine should be. For background, you should be comfortable with how to think about both of these functions using the unit circle; that is, the circle with radius $1$ centered at the origin^{1}.

For example, how would you interpret the value $\sin(0.8)$ if the value $\theta = 0.8$ is understood to be in radians?
You might imagine walking around a circle with a radius of $1$, starting from the rightmost point, until you’ve traversed the distance $0.8$ in arc length.
This is the same thing as saying you've traversed an *angle* of $0.8$ radians. Then $\sin(\theta)$ is your height above the $x$-axis at this point.

As theta increases, and you walk around the circle, your height bobs up and down and up and down.
So the graph of $\sin(\theta)$ vs. $\theta$, which plots this height as a function of arc length, is a wave pattern. This is the *quintessential* wave pattern.

Just from looking at this graph, we can get a feel for the shape of the derivative function. The slope at $0$ is something positive, then as $\sin(\theta)$ approaches its peak, the slope goes down to $0$. Then the slope is negative for a little while before coming back up to $0$ as the $\sin(\theta)$ graph levels out. If you’re familiar with the graphs of trig functions, you might guess that this derivative graph should be exactly $\cos(\theta)$, whose graph is just a shifted-back copy of the sine graph.

But all this tells us is that the peaks and valleys of the derivative graph seem to line up with the graph of cosine. How could we know that this derivative actually *is* the cosine of theta, and not just some new function that looks similar to it? As with the previous examples of this video, a more exact understanding of the derivative requires looking at what the function itself represents, rather than the graph of the function.

Think back to the walk around the unit circle, having traversed an arc length of $\theta$, where $\sin(\theta)$ is the height of this point. Consider a slight nudge of $d$-theta along the circumference of the circle; a tiny step in your walk around the unit circle. How much does this change $\sin(\theta)$? How much does that step change your *height* above the x-axis? This is best observed by zooming in on the point where you are on the circle.

Zoomed in close enough the circle basically looks like a straight line in this neighborhood. Consider the right triangle pictured below, where the hypotenuse represents a straight-line approximation of the nudge $d \theta$ along the circumference, and this left side represents the change in height; the resulting tiny nudge to $\sin(\theta)$.

This tiny triangle is actually similar to this larger triangle with the defining angle theta, and whose hypotenuse is the radius of the circle with length $1$. Specifically, the angle between its height $d(\sin(\theta))$ and its hypotenuse $d\theta$ is precisely equal to $\theta$.

Think about what the derivative of sine is supposed to mean. It’s the ratio between that $d\left(\sin(\theta)\right)$, the tiny change to the output of sine, divided by $d \theta$, the tiny change to the input of the function. From the picture, that’s the ratio between the length of the side adjacent to this little right triangle divided by the hypotenuse. Well, let’s see, adjacent divided by hypotenuse; that’s exactly what $\cos(\theta)$ means!

Notice, by considering the slope of the graph, we can get a quick intuitive feel for the rough shape that the derivative of $\sin(\theta)$ should have, which is enough to make an educated guess. But to more to understand why this derivative is *precisely* $\cos(\theta)$, we had to begin our line of reasoning with the defining features of $\sin(\theta)$.

For those of you who enjoy pausing and pondering, take a moment to find a similar line of reasoning that explains what the derivative of $\cos(\theta)$ should be.

In the next lesson we'll figure out the derivatives of functions that combine simple functions like these, either as sums, products, or functions compositions. Similar to this lesson, we’ll try to understand each rule geometrically, in a way that makes it intuitively reasonable and memorable.

# Thanks

Special thanks to those below for supporting the original video behind this post, and to current patrons for funding ongoing projects. If you find these lessons valuable, consider joining.